POLAND’S CURSE
People cannot choose their family
members. Countries cannot choose their neighbours.
Poland is a living testimony of that stark reality.
Indeed, Poland has been the victim of
her Geography and has been bullied by her neighbours.
Geographically, Poland is highly
vulnerable: she sits right on the great
North European Plain that stretches all the way from Northern France to Moscow.
It is a long stretch of land deprived of major physical obstacles, but for a
few large rivers, like the Rhine, the Elba, or the Vistula. Consequently, it has been the venue of choice for
invaders charging East from the West, or stampeding West, coming from the East.
So, Poland has been frequently
invaded, whether for the purpose of conquering the country, or just en route to somewhere else.
On top of Geography, come the neighbours:
* To the West, Poland has faced the
Germans in several formats: Prussia, II Reich, Weimar Germany, III Reich, two
Germanies and, finally, Germany.
* To the South, up to 1918, Poland had
to contend with the Austrians, who led the powerful Austro-Hungarian Empire.
* To the East lie the Russians: Czarist
Russia, the Soviet Union and present-day Russia.
Summing these factors we end up
with an interesting statistical information: between 1795 and 1989, Poland was really
independent for 20 years, between 1919 and 1939. A bit more than 10% of the
time in almost 200 years.
When I first visited Poland in 1990, the
Poles were terrified with the prospective German reunification and Chancellor Helmut Kohl’s
apparent hesitation about recognizing the Oder-Neisse line as the German-Polish
border.
When I went back to Poland in 2004, the
Poles were buoyant with their NATO and EU memberships, and their fear of both
Germany and Russia had receded. The former was integrated in the same international
clubs that Poland had just joined and the latter was still recovering from the
post-Soviet trauma.
Today, in 2014, the Poles are deeply
worried about the fate of Ukraine and the pressure Russia has been exerting on
her periphery and the sense of fear has returned.
Russia has reacted aggressively
to what she perceives as a renewed Eastern push by the major Western powers and
their prime organisations, NATO and the EU.
Russia has reacted in 2008
invading Georgia who capitulated in a week. Russia has reacted to Yanukovych’s
overthrow with a swift takeover of Crimea, accompanied by increasing pressure
on Kiev, via pro-Russian groups in Eastern Ukraine, natural gas price
increases, nearby military manoeuvres and not recognizing the new
government in Kiev. Furthermore, Moscow has been pressing and cajoling Moldova,
Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan to try to keep them in her sphere of influence
or, at least, keeping the West at bay.
Historical victims of Russian
(and German) expansionism like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have been
pushing for an increased NATO and US military presence in Northeastern Europe
and near the Ukrainian border in order to bolster confidence in these
borderlands about the West’s commitment to the safety and protection of the
nations that stretch from the Baltic Sea (like Poland) to the Black Sea (like
Romania). Warsaw has gone as far as demanding the dispatch of 10.000 American
troops to her territory.
History is fascinating, but for
countries like Poland it is not at all cheerful. In 2014, none of the major
Western powers has the ability and even less so the will, to engage on a major
military buildup along the old Soviet borders. Although there are obvious
differences, the unwillingness draws an inevitable flashback to Czechoslovakia
and Poland in 1938/1939. And this is not good news for the likes of Poland and
Romania.
Washington, London, Berlin and
Paris do not believe that Moscow is about to embark on a massive land offensive
across Eastern Europe and certainly not to the point of crossing the Dnieper river.
Indeed they did not believe that Germany and the USSR would do what they
actually did in between 1938 and 1941 either. Of course today’s Russia is not
the 1930’s USSR or Germany, but looking from Warsaw’s perspective it must be,
at least, uncomfortable.
Whatever Russia’s ultimate plans
and intentions, it is crystal clear that the
US and NATO are NOT about to establish major military garrisons neither in
Poland, nor in Romania, nor in the Baltic States. The reasons for this are
threefold: political, budgetary and military.
Politically, the Western powers do not want to be
seen as being too provocative towards Moscow, or to risk a skirmish or an
incident with potential serious consequences.
Budget-wise, NATO members are generally cash-strapped,
many of them stuck in steep austerity and they do not have either the financial
capital, nor the political capital to march East, or anywhere else for that
matter.
Militarily, the West is weakened by years of
neglect aggravated by some more years of savage austerity. If Poland were
indeed threatened by Russia (which she isn’t),
NATO would struggle to find the troops and equipment to go to the rescue.
In the end, this is what Russia
has been accomplishing: proving that she can make surgical low-risk military
moves (Georgia, Crimea), put political, economic and energy pressure on her neighbours and sow instability, doubt and
fear on them, that no substantial reprisal will come her way.
Eventually, this strategy may
pay-off in terms of political acquiescence of an increased Russia’s role and
influence in Central and Eastern Europe. It may not happen, but so far Russia is rolling and the West is
recoiling. Even if the plot
ultimately fails, the seeds of fear and insecurity have been sown and they will
not go away for a long time.
Prussia, Russia and Austria,
greedily slicing the Polish cake till
it was over.
For a country like Poland that was partitioned
to oblivion thrice in just 23 years (1772, 1793 and 1795) between Russia, Prussia
and Austria; when it took Poland a World War for her to resuscitate; after 20 years of freedom, another
World War threw it into mayhem and serfdom for another 50 years, these events
are not bad news. They are more like a curse revisited time and time again.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário