16 janeiro, 2017
One Step Ahead
ONE STEP AHEAD
North Korean rocket launch: Relentlessly building a deterrent.
For years it has been assumed that North Korea’s nuclear programme was just a tool to be traded for acceptance, recognition and material advantages from countries such as the United States and Japan. That was certainly the case for some time and it could be still a secondary goal. However, it is not the primary one. Not anymore.
In January 2016, some days after North Korea’s 4th nuclear test, we published a post (“Threat or Bluff”) here at Tempos Interessantes where we stated that Pyongyang’s nuclear programme served a deterrence purpose, more of an insurance policy than a bargaining chip.
Why does North Korea pursue a nuclear weapons programme?
In two words, Power and Security. North Korea is surrounded by great powers, some of which openly hostile to her, so she views nuclear weapons as an insurance policy against an attack, or an attempt at subversion and regime change.
in “Tempos Interessantes” at http://tempos-interessantes.blogspot.pt/2016/01/threat-or-bluff.html
Nevertheless, most officials and analysts in North America and East Asia kept on with the old mantra, assuming that if some measure of legitimacy and comfort were bestowed upon the North Korean regime, Pyongyang would let go of its nukes.
By last Autumn, things started to change. Former Asia expert at the George W. Bush administration, Victor Cha, declared in September to the House Foreign Affairs Committee:
“Testing was once interpreted by pundits to be an attention-getting effort for dialogue with the United States,” but “it would be irresponsible today to adhere to such an interpretation”. In today’s world, “North Korea is executing a strategy designed to demonstrate a survivable nuclear deterrent before the next US administration comes into office.” Cha insisted that the North Korean government sought to acquire nuclear weapons for the purpose of deterring its enemies.
in “The Wire” at https://thewire.in/77597/north-koreas-nuclear-ticket-to-survival/
Arguably even more relevant were the declarations of James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, proffered last October:
“I think the notion of getting the North Koreans to denuclearize is probably a lost cause,” Clapper said at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. “They are not going to do that. That is their ticket to survival.”
“The best we could probably hope for is some sort of a cap, but they are not going to do that just because we ask them. There’s going to have to be some significant inducements.”
in “Japan Times” at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/10/26/asia-pacific/clapper-says-push-get-pyongyang-shed-nuclear-arms-probably-lost-cause/#.WHzQ63nFaUk
Further reinforcing my point is outgoing Secretary of State John Kerry’s strong denial that this is so. Given that Kerry mostly lives in an alternative reality, his rebuttal is a strong confirmation of Tempos Interessantes’ post.
In the last few years, North Korea has mostly shunned any prospective round of negotiations and she has not taken any meaningful initiative of her own to engage in one. In the same period, North Korea has greatly intensified the pace of nuclear warheads’ and missiles’ developing and testing. Pyongyang has pursued these programmes weathering increasingly tough sanctions and isolation.
This is not the kind of effort to be thrown away in exchange for oil, cereals and a treaty. It is a race for a WMD insurance policy and it is not going away.
So, we are happy that the readers’ of Tempos Interessantes were privileged to be offered this new vision of nuclear weapons’ role in North Korea’s foreign and security policy nine months ahead of most people.~
TEMPOS INTERESSANTES, ONE STEP AHEAD!