Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Man of the Year. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Man of the Year. Mostrar todas as mensagens

31 dezembro, 2017

Man of the Year 2017



MAN OF THE YEAR 2017:



KIM JONG UN

 
KIM JONG UN,
TEMPOS INTERESSANTES’ MAN OF THE YEAR 2017

Tempos Interessantes’ Man of the Year 2017 is KIM JONG UN!

The man rattled the world all year round. He dared the United States, faced up to China, scoffed at South Korea, ignored Japan and showed utter contempt for the United Nations, especially the UN Security Council Resolutions. He resisted sanctions, military exercises, military threats, provocations, isolation, diplomatic forays and overtures, rants, pleas and ever more sanctions.

And he went on testing nuclear weapons. And he went on testing ballistic missiles. And he tested a thermonuclear device. And he wrapped up the year testing an ICBM apparently capable of striking New York and Washington D.C.

He relishes it and he boasts of it. He is Kim Jong Un, Tempos Interessantes’ Man of the Year 2017.

A man who leads a small, poor, isolated and widely despised and/or hated nation, but nevertheless manages to challenge the powers-that-be and carry on with his plans, is certainly deserving of a nomination for a person who was successful and influential in the current year.

The secret for Kim’s success (here measured against his objectives) lies on his determination, shrewdness and ruthlessness, as well as, on his opponents’ mismanagement and misperception of North Korea.

 
From 2006 to 2017, the relentless sequence of increasingly powerful nuclear tests.

in “STRATFOR” at https://worldview.stratfor.com/

Starting with the latter, the grossest evaluation was considering Kim a raven lunatic, a maniac bent on random destruction, a loose-cannon with no real perception of reality that was racing towards self-destruction. In the words of US Senator John McCain, he is “a crazy fat kid”. Kim Jong Un, as Tempos Interessantes has alerted over the years, is none of it, as the events have been proving.

Then, there was this long held belief that North Korea wanted nuclear weapons to unleash destruction over South Korea, or, at least, blackmail her into submission (unification under the aegis of Pyongyang). This is outright silly, but there are still people standing by it.

Then, there was, there is and there will be the conviction that North Korea will eventually buckle down under the pressure of sanctions. This is like trying something that fails repeatedly and still thinking you are right. Praise to those who still can devise new (and useless) sanctions.

There is also the twin faith in US military pressure and Chinese political and economic influence to make the DPRK backtrack. It has been 11 years since the first nuclear test and… just keep the faith.

Last but not least, there is the surrealistic demand that North Korea dismantles her nuclear programme, one of the best examples of a non-starter. A country,  a regime, a leader, commit themselves to achieve a nuclear power status against all odds, come hell or high water, and then, when the goal is well within reach, if not attained yet, they would just throw away their prize, what they regard as their life insurance? Good luck with that.

 
North Korea’s missile launches from 1984 to September 2017 under the three Kims: Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un. Only in 2017 there were 20 missile tests.

in ”MISSILE THREAT” at https://missilethreat.csis.org/


Going back to the former, Kim Jong Un, following the steps of his forebears, has skilfully managed the interactions with the great powers, drawing on their fears, prejudices, interests and objectives to get the most out of each, or to sow discord between them.

Accordingly, he conditioned China’s punishments of North Korea because of Beijing’s fear that, if the regime collapsed and the country unravelled, China would be flooded with refugees, the Korean Peninsula would plunge into instability or chaos, the DPRK could be absorbed by South Korea and there would be American troops just across the Yalu river from China.

Kim’s seemingly rash and aggressive posture terrified South Korea, fearful that, if hard pressed, the North would unleash hellish artillery and rocket fire over Seoul. Besides, even without an attack, the prospect of a North Korean collapse gives the shivers to the South Korean government.

The Americans mostly feared a North Korean ICBM capable of striking the continental United States, but they also got entangled in East Asia complex of interests, perceptions and fears. On top of it, their fear is becoming real.

So, playing the lunatic role, Kim managed to deter more aggressive measures from his antagonists who reasoned that “the man is crazy, so he is bound to do crazy things.” Well, it turns out he is not. Of course, being the ruthless leader of a totalitarian state helps. There is no opposition, no protests, no accountability; the hardship that most people suffer just has to be submissively endured.

Moreover, despite being young and supposedly inexperienced, Kim could read the writing on the wall. Like Bashar Al Assad in Syria, he took due notice of the fate of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Muammar Kadhafi in Libya. And both realised that resisting and fighting back (Assad), or acquiring the ultimate deterrence (Kim) could shield them from American regime change adventures and from US sponsored personal termination.

From the moment the regime decides that nuclear deterrent is vital to its survival, the obvious outcome is that it will do everything necessary to achieve it. This is the key to understand the reason why this poor country has engaged in such a costly endeavour, why Kim does not slow down and much less give up, why sanctions do not work and also why North Korea will not use the nukes unless she perceives an existential threat.

The nuclear weapons North Korea has been developing and amassing are not conceived to start a war. They are North Korea’s deterrence against her enemies, or prevention against a perceived major threat. Period. The bottom line is, if one leaves North Korea in peace, she will not use her nukes.

Going forward, North Korea has virtually achieved her nuclear programme’s main goals. There is certainly still room for improvement (there are doubts about the performance of the re-entry vehicle), but the fundamental features, a thermonuclear device and an ICBM, have been achieved. Against all odds, the major powers were defeated and they will have to put up with North Korea as the 9th nuclear power on earth.




Previous “Man of the Year Posts:

MAN OF THE YEAR 2016” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2015” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2014” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2013” em

“(WO)MAN OF THE YEAR 2012” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2011” em

31 dezembro, 2016

Man of the Year 2016


MAN OF THE YEAR 2016:

DONALD TRUMP

 
DONALD TRUMP,
TEMPOS INTERESSANTES’ MAN OF THE YEAR 2016

Since Tempos Interessantes established its “Man of the Year” award in 2011, this year’s choice was the easiest one so far.

Tempos Interessantes’ Man of the Year 2016 is DONALD TRUMP!

Donald Trump rocked the American political system and has started rocking the international system even before taking the oath of office.

Trump’s saga started when he decided to run in the Republican primaries to get the Republican Party presidential nomination. He was viewed with a mix of scorn and disdain, something of an outcast, a curiosity, or a joke. Trump faced a field of 16 opponents, some of whom with strong reputations, mostly governors and senators. He was underestimated, derided and heavily criticised, yet he beat his opponents one by one.

With less than a handful of candidates left standing, he started to be seen as a real threat and efforts and strategies were concocted to bring him down. Ted Cruz, the last surviving candidate was knocked out in Indiana in May. Then, the mantra was that there would be a rebellion at the Republican Convention in Cleveland, or even that he would drop out, because he really did not want the trouble of being President. However, Donald Trump was crowned at the Convention.

In the Summer, there were two currents: those who asked for a third candidate to come forward, or hat Trump would be dumped by his party and, consequently, would be crushed by Hillary Clinton in November, in spite of the fact that the opinion polls were telling a very different story.

During the campaign, Trump mostly stuck to his style, although he heeded more to his new team’s counselling. He continued to hit hard at Clinton, kept on campaigning relentlessly in the key states, some of which Clinton neglected (and lost), always attracting big crowds and being the centre of the media’s attention.

Come November, against all odds, against the powers that be, against all media, and against most people that mattered, he won. And he won clearly with a 74 vote margin in the Electoral College.

In spite of (and because of) his apparently reckless speech and his outrageous comments, Trump succeeded and he did because he knew better. He (mostly) knew what he was doing and the purpose of it all. He tapped into the deep feelings of a substantial share of the electorate who felt neglected, even betrayed, by the ruling elite, as well as, the general discontent with the political and the media establishment, perceived as being self-serving, corrupt and pursuing social and economic agendas that were alien to them. The ferocity of this establishment’s reaction to Trump’s rise only furthered his credibility and thus his popularity. On top of it all, he also benefited from having a poor, widely disliked opponent, with a long record of deceit, cover-ups and dubious actions, who very much embodied the “Washington” so many Americans despise.

Beyond the United States, Hillary Clinton was also the favourite candidate for most international players, safe Russia, Israel and a few more. Accordingly, most were struck by an election outcome they did not believe to be possible. And suddenly everybody just went into crisis mode, especially in Europe, always more prone to hysteria, Mexico, Central America and, to a lesser extent, East Asia.

Trump’s tools.

It was interesting to notice how supposedly experienced and professional politicians were so very much caught off-guard and seemed unable to react to and to manage the changed circumstances. Donald Trump, with his campaign statements, his election victory and a few tweets, seems to have thrown a lot of international players off-balance. So much so that the Germans started debating the outlandish possibility of acquiring a nuclear deterrent, the South Koreans intensified the talk about their own nukes, the Japanese rushed to meet Trump in New York, some East Europeans are freaking out with NATO’s future, Ukraine is scared, China is angry, Iran is rattled, Turkey is at a loss. And Russia, Israel, Hungary, Egypt and Saudi Arabia are cautiously happy.

Donald Trump is by far the politician who has exerted more impact before even holding the reins of actual power in recent memory. It seems to be consensual that things will not be the same after 20th January. How different, depends on how Trump performs at the White House. Now the questions that loom larger are:

            * What is Trump going to do with that power?

            * How effective will he be in implementing his agenda?

            * How much (and what parts) of his agenda does he actually want to implement?

            * How cooperative will the Congress be?

            * How will foreign powers adapt to and react to his style and policies?

Given Trump’s very different approach to politics, all these questions bear a big question mark.

Domestically, the biggest change he could implement would be to effectively “drain the swamp”, i.e. exterminate or largely reduce the size, power and influence of special interests, lobbies, think tanks and assorted institutions that largely live off government money whilst influencing and constraining government policy. This will be very difficult to achieve, but something will have to be done since this was one of Trump’s major pledges and one that mobilised large support.

Another lynchpin of his mandate should be the job-recovery/manufacturing-resurrection pledge. This will not be easy either, but it is the part of his platform that delivered him Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin, so it will be crucial for Trump-2020. So much so, that he has already started to work on this front, fighting job-dislocation and terminating the TPP.

 
The ultimate pledge.

Externally, his biggest challenges will be China, Russia and the Middle East.

Concerning China, the expectation is to see if Trump has the courage and determination to confront Beijing not only on the trade front, but on the security front, too. China has been given virtual free rein in East Asia to expand, harass and threaten her neighbours, occupying islands and rocks belonging to others and challenging fundamental American interests. If Donald Trump makes the United States stand up to Beijing there will be interesting (and better) times in the West Pacific.

Another task will be to find a reconciliation path with Russia. The interest and the will are there, but the future President will have to overcome the strong Russo phobic crowd in Washington, not to mention the Russian bogeyman agitated by Eastern Europeans.

Finally there is the Middle East which has a special knack to find its way to the top of every American President’s foreign policy. Here are the most relevant issues to follow:

           
            * What will be done with the “bad nuclear deal with Iran?

* What will be the relationship with the regional powers (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran)? The former two seem to be better positioned.

* Healing and improving the shattered US-Israel relationship after the end of the most anti-Israel administration in more than half a century.

* The fight against the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda, the probable step back from the Syrian War and the interactions with Moscow will also merit attention.

Mixing the homeland and overseas, there are two more campaign issues whose evolution will be imperative to accompany: the Wall separating the US from Mexico and immigration, especially the Muslim variety.

Donald Trump has his job cut out for him. Given his pride and his large ego, he will undoubtedly try to deliver. Given the way he challenged and overcame all odds in 2016, given the way he rocked America and the world, one thing this blog is NOT going to do is to underestimate the Man of the Year 2016.




Previous “Man of the Year Posts:

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2015” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2014” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2013” em

“(WO)MAN OF THE YEAR 2012” em

“MAN OF THE YEAR 2011” em